This research article examines legal discrimination against children born out of wedlock in Iran. Despite laws promoting equality, societal attitudes influenced by beliefs continue to result in discrimination. The study explores the reconciliation of religious beliefs with legal frameworks and the changes made to the Iranian legal system in response to positive human rights developments. The Article seeks to bridge the research gaps by comparing the experiences of Iranian children with those in other countries affected by Islamic law. The study employs library sources and descriptive and historical research methods to examine the legal status of children born outside of marriage, both nationally and internationally, and the discrimination they face. The Article is structured into four distinct sections: an analysis of Islamic Law, a review of the Iranian legal system, an assessment of Iran's compliance with international conventions, and a discourse on the necessity of substantial positive change. The Article ultimately recommends the eradication of discrimination through heightened awareness and the advancement of inclusivity for all children, irrespective of their lineage. In summary, this research Article aims to shed light on legal challenges faced by children born outside of marriage in Iran, with the goal of promoting positive changes in their treatment.

Robotic surgery is an advanced technology in the field of medicine that performs surgeries using medical robots. This technology is highly regarded due to its high accuracy, reduction of pain and recovery time of patients. In the legal aspects of robotic surgery, legal issues such as medical responsibility, patient rights, intellectual property rights and practical rights related to the use of this technology in surgeries are examined. Therefore, to perform robotic surgery, the doctor must have the necessary licenses from the relevant organizations and the patient must be familiar with all the details and risks related to the surgery. Also, if any problem occurs during the surgery, the doctor is responsible for it. In terms of intellectual property rights, companies producing medical robots must protect their intellectual property rights against others, and on the other hand, doctors must use these robots as a tool to perform surgery. Overall, the legal aspects of robotic surgery include many issues that must be considered to ensure patient recovery and optimal use of this technology.

Background and purpose: Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem during pregnancy and assumes to be a part of normal pregnancy caused by normal physiological changes. Pregnancy-related LBP is one of the main reasons for disability, absence from work and responsible for huge direct and indirect economical impact.  This article systematically reviews papers concerning the epidemiology and risk factors on LBP in pregnant women.  Materials and methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Rose-Net, OVID, and BIDS were searched for the period of 1985-2003, using the key words 'low back pain', 'epidemiology', 'pregnancy', 'risk factors'. In addition, references given in relevant publications were used. Results: Eighteen studies were identified. Eleven studies investigated epidemiology of LBP during pregnancy and the prevalence were reported >50% in 8 (73%) studies.  Ten studies were carried out on the epidemiology of LBP after pregnancy.  The prevalence of LBP were reported >40% in 6 (60%) studies.  Among different reported risk factors, previous LBP as well as younger age were the most important risk factors. Conclusion: Although there were some methodological flaws (e.g., small sample size of the study population, lack of clear classification and definition for LBP, different study design, different methods of study implementation, etc.) which precludes strong conclusion, it appears that LBP is one of the most common problem, during pregnancy and after delivery. It should also be noted that education and certain exercises can be beneficial to the pregnant women in the absence of medical complications.

In Islamic jurisprudence and law, Qasamah has been stated as one of the proofs of the lawsuit in crimes such as murder, wound, and amputation. Regarding the collection of the traditions of the infallibles and also the historical background about Qasamah, the doubt and the denial of any jurist and lawyer in this jurisprudential establishment, in which Qasamah is the reason of proof, seems unnecessary. Therefore, this research aims to examine the question of why the Imams (AS), while strongly emphasizing the consolidation of Qasamah and the expressing its irregular nature and the likelihood of establishing Qasamah as a legal reason, have been restricted Qasamah to specific cases. In addition, this research studies the evidences of Qasamah documentation and analyzes the possibility of the reason for its rejection, as well as further deduction in the traditions. It should also be mentioned that the research does not study the conditions of the lawth and the number of oaths necessary for murder, wound, and amputation of the organ. The result of the research shows that Qasamah is not a reason of proof. The problems and doubts about the implementation of Qasamah have been explained in this regard. Therefore, it is suggested that the legislator carries out the necessary examinations and makes the necessary changes in the Islamic Penal Code.

Based on the spread of the phenomena of terror and terrorism in today's world, its changing form is simultaneous with the progress of science and technology, the utilization of biological agents in humans, animals, plants, medicines, foodstuffs, etc. and ultimately the annihilation of human beings in order to dominate the resources of other nations. It is to an extent that biological agents are used as biological or bio-terroristic weapons to destroy and weaken others. Therefore, after defining the bioterrorism, its jurisprudential and legal review, correspondence of this type of terror with the jurisprudential components and reviewing the jurisprudential verdict of defense against this phenomenon are among the objectives of this article. Content reporting is investigated as library and field research. The permission or lack of permission of using bioterrorism weapons is also investigated.